Chris Wolfe 98.03.29
Beautiful presentation of cloning... and I wish a lot of real corporations would learn how to make slick web sites :)
Joe Smith 98.03.27
Don't get your pany hose in a not. Htis is just a cool spoof site. A job weel done thoug. A good forum for cloning discussions.
Soulless droid w/o conscience 98.03.27
I definitely believe that cloning is not only good for the human race, but also for us already cloned humans. Furthering this technology will only help scientists eradicate certain troublesome side-effects, like the unpredictable moodswings, violent tendencies, and world domination delusions... Still, I'm sure that those will eventually be controllable...

-Soulless 'droid' with no conscience that will only bring an end to society as we know it.
Elisa Lucita-Conchita ZanaLove@aol.com 98.03.26
I don't really think cloning is a good idea, but I'm a bit undecided. If I could clone Eric(see guest book signing below), then then i could have one all to my self. Eric is a hottie in my Spanish class. He's tall with blonde hair and blue eyes. E-mail me for his phone number (J/J, Eric, don't spas).
Eric 98.03.26
I think that it's kind of interesting how many people (including me!) are using this site for English paper research. This is a very informative site and I am glad I have the opportunity to use this information in my own report as well as see just how other people feel about this topic. Keep up the good work.
Eric 98.03.25
I think cloning is indecent and morally wrong. I think that if this sort of thing is allowed to continue, that the world will be populated with soulless 'droids' with no conscience that will only bring an end to society as we know it. Animals...I can see animals, but messing with human lives is only asking for trouble.
Cassia 98.03.22
I'm all for the cloning of animals... I'm not so sure about the cloning of human beings, though.
Michael Schroter mschroter@yahoo.com 98.03.21
Cloning...it's an interesting topic. I think it can help humans, but at the same time, it can have a disastrous affect on human evolution. I think more studies need to be done regarding this controversial subject.
Archana msriram@hal-pc.org 98.03.20
Actually, my stand on cloning is "indifferent." This site truly helped with my english paper. It continues to help, actually, because I can come here whenever my next draft is due to find more and more recent articles to help with my paper (which is pro-cloning, but that's because if anything, I am perhaps closer to that side). I know my little signature in this guestbook is just one tiny one out of hundreds, but I guess it's good to sign it (again).
Brad 98.03.18
Outstanding web site... Thoroughly amusing, as well as very informative. An immense help with my English work!


A.Carr 98.03.13
cloning is wrong!everyone needs to stop and think about how they would feel if they were always taking blame for their clone.what is the world coming to?
A.Carr 98.03.13
cloning is wrong!everyone needs to stop and think about how they would feel if they were always taking blame for their clone.what is the world coming to?
Michael S Brooks mbrooks@agpo.baton.com 98.03.13
To those who would argue that we were never meant to take advantage of cloning because we are in effect playing God, I hope none of you have had a family member saved through surgical means. This argument has been used to protest various forms of surgery and other areas of research for centuries. Eventually, after processes are proven to be effective these discoveries become a mainstay in our lives. It's humainties destiny to learn, this cannot be done under a veil of ignorance.
J Mullen 98.03.12
Get a grip! A clone is the same thing as a twin, except there is an age difference. There will be clones in the world soon, so get used to the idea.

Imagine, we could clone Stephen Hawking, and when the original passes away, the copy could continue his research. We might even be able to clone him without the muscle disease he has, so he could do research and also get out and play some frisbee.

Or just think, we could clone the Rockettes - what a completely perfect kick line that would be!
I.P.Freely yellowrivers@aol.com 98.03.12
I like clones. They are good for cleaning and cooking and other stuff. Mine does whatever I want her to do. Her name is Laura Croft. She is very sexy and has huge boobs. It is great, but my wife gets jealous sometimes. Cloning is great. I want another clone. One of Jenny McCarthy or Pamela Anderson would be nice. They would probably cost a lot though. Maybe you could discount it just for me?
JAck Studer jack_studer@baylor.chattanooga.net 98.03.11
Cloning could be a very beneficial technology if we only allow ourselves to use it. It could help human kind both research and fight diseases. Not only could we rebuild damaged tissue for people such as burn victims, but we could also regrow an entire organ such as a new liver for someone with liver cancer.
These benefits, should cloning be banned altogether, would not, however, be available to most Americans. Only those who could afford to have the procedures done out of the country would reap the benefits of cloning and its related technologies. Furthermore, the research and development for cloning is going to happen no matter how much the U.S. government tries to keep it from happening. It will take place in third world countries if the U.S. does not allow it. In these third world countries, there will be less sanitary and more corrupt practices. Any and all research would be very unsafe and highly unsanitary. If, on the other hand, we were to keep cloning and all of its related technologies in the civilized world, we could monitor and regulate it. In addition, and perhaps maybe a little more far-fetched, if cloning research were to take place in an unregulated environment, it could lead to the creation of human-animal hybrids, a scenario no one is prepared to deal with.
The economic effects of cloning, if it is banned, could be horrific for our nation’s health care industry. Imagine, if you will, that a fairly wealthy sufferer of liver cancer has two choices: 1) stay in the U.S. and undergo months of chemotherapy, or 2) travel to some obscure off-shore island and have a new liver grown and implanted. Option number one is not only more painful, but also less likely to succeed. There would be no choice in the patient’s mind: go offshore or live no more. Although this scenario is not on our near horizon, it is on our horizon.
If the U.S. bans cloning, the newest technology to come from the technological age of the 80’s and 90’s, it will in effect be digging its own grave. The U.S. is envied world wide for its prosperousness and its power. If third world countries possessed cloning capabilities, they would use it to gain the upper hand and get their greedy little hands in America’s pocket. As of now, cloning technology is only possessed by a handful of international superpowers, but if these super powers reject cloning, it will fall into the hands of third world dictators. While not all third world dictators are corrupt and evil, some are and all it would take would be one crazed lunatic with cloning technology to throw the entire world into chaos. Imagine a man who can engineer and replicate the perfect soldier: one who does not fear anything and will do exactly what he is told. A scary thought. Only the sick and twisted will abuse technology, so as long as we don’t let the technology out of our domain of control, we will be able to regulate it.

If doctors could clone white blood cells and amass for any individual a store of disease fighting cells, we could inject these pathogen killers any time a person got sick, thus expediting the recovery process for any given disease.
Furthermore, any cancer that is localized to one or two organs could be treated by simply replacing the infected organ with one grown from cloning. Because the organs and white blood cells would be genetically identical to what they are replacing, the chance of rejection would be lowered immeasurably.
If doctors were allowed to create “headless” humans, that is humans that could not think, we could study diseases more in depth. We could also use these humans to grow spare parts for ourselves, thus prolonging our lives and productivity as human beings.
Now that we have determined the efficacy and goodness of cloning certain body parts, what keeps us from condoning the cloning of entire bodies? Two things: 1) Pity and 2) God.
Pity slows us down because we are an emotional species. We seem to care about every living thing and how it “feels,” not how we can use it. This attitude must change if we are to blossom to our utmost potential. Even if the growing of spare bodies was legalized, we would still have the problem of where to keep them. This could easily be solved by putting them in body farms, no need for niceties; they are, after all, just livestock. In the end however, whoever actually used the spare parts would most likely feel a pang of guilt. “An innocent person died just so I could have a second chance.” The previous statement would in no way shape or form be true. What separates humans from monkeys? Only our ability to communicate, feel, and rationalize. Could this being which was killed for spare parts think? Rationalize? Could it feel emotions? The answer to all these questions is no. Moreover, this being that was used for spare parts was created for one reason: to serve its owner/patron, much as a cow serves a farmer.
For anyone who believes in god, cloning presents a difficult and sticky predicament. Creating a “headless” (unthinking) human being would give humans enormous power and/or responsibility. God would, in effect, cease to be the ultimate decision-maker. We, as humans possessing the ability to engineer and thus alter god’s creations, would supersede him as the supreme decision-maker. Now, to those who say, “Well, god gave us the ability to eliminate every living thing from the face of the earth (nuclear warfare). Just because he gave us this ability does not mean we should use it. Thusly, just because he gave us the ability to clone doesn’t mean we should clone.” The other side of that coin is: “God didn’t give us cloning. He might have given us nuclear warheads as a test, but he would not give us the ability to replace him. He would not intentionally eliminate the necessity for himself. Why would he?” Atomic weapons can only eliminate humans, but cloning can eliminate god.
With all this having been said, one must consider what the world, and the U.S. in particular, can gain from cloning. Are the benefits we would reap greater than the woes we would endure? Yes. They must be, otherwise cloning would eliminate itself. The natural course of things eliminates anything that is not efficient and effective to benefit mankind. In other words, we would not have spent the time, nor effort, into developing something that turns out to be just a novelty. We spent all the time and effort developing cloning for a reason: it will further mankind’s evolution and benefit us in our effort to combat disease. Those who wish to over-regulate and outlaw cloning are only hindering technology’s progress not preventing it.

Richard Marchant moneyguy2@aol.com 98.03.10
I don't believe in the cloning of human beings. It's not right. it wasn't meant to be
Amanda Yarch 98.03.10
I think that cloning has many positive properties. I could take the world to the next level. We could end so much suffering for the couples that have either lost a child or a loved one.
Brett Dickie 98.03.10
Cool dude! It's nice to see that you don't discriminate against homosexuals like me.
David Powys powys@magna.com.au 98.03.09
This would have to be one of the nicest looking sites around, and informative to boot.
keep up the good work.
Trevor Wilson rage@hutch.com.au 98.03.08
BRILLIANT! I love the site. The colours, the script. All excellent. I will attach a link to my site ASAP.
Busther Cherry 98.03.06
I think cloning is cool dude.
Tóth János 98.03.06
Hiya,
I started to read the main page of DreamTech and then it become suspicious. Fortunately I looked at the bottom of the page. Hmm, Legal notices. Let's see it.
It's _really_ typed with small letters. :)
The DreamTech is for :
- a website for both side of opinion about cloning
- people have to pay attention for tiny pieces of information on websites like this one

The site is great. See you in other dimension and a bit later.

Charles Dickey I Nameles@aol.com 98.03.02
Still marvelling at Adrian!! I love you, man.
Valerie lykes-fam@worldnet.att.net 98.03.02
I am doing a report on cloning and I am sure this site will help, but if someone could tell me if there are any states that are going to get involved in this issue soon, it would be a great help to me. So far, I have heard a great deal about federal government's roles, but absolutely nothing with states. -thank you
Kevin Wenning KevinWenning@clearwater.edu 98.03.01
I need more information on the topic both ways. I am inclined to believe that cloning is unethical, but definitely has excellent uses. If you have a strong feeling about genetic engineering, a personal testimony, or hard evidence about the evils or benefits of it please e-mail me.
If you know of someone who has experience with cloning that I could interview, that would also be much appreciated. I live in Clearwater Florida.